edwardthern wrote: > But, but, but.....lol > > No buts, loose free or not the cable and standard was IMPROVED..... > IMPROVED. therefore loose free or not, packet delivery is IMPROVED. > > by you thinking there is no need to improve the standard when either way > no changes in packets can be verified. Well obviously the Cat standards > committee and millions of others say you are wrong.
You're making the logical mistake that just because a change was made, your hobby horse unfounded assertions are validated. The actual reasons for the upgrade are widely publicized and well-known and not what you say, Edward. http://www.cablinginstall.com/articles/2013/05/how-cat8-will-solve.html "What Category 8 copper cabling will do for the data center is let them transport data four times faster on essentially the same type of cable they now use, says Sterling Vaden, chair of TIA 42.7, the TIA subcommittee on copper cabling systems. That makes great sense application-wise and economically, because the intended data rate being developed by IEEE is 40-Gb, 4 times faster than 10GBase-T, using the same or less power per port, which has an unofficial target of less than 2 Watts. So Edward, do we attribute this major discrepancy between your claims and the actual facts to your ignorance of the true facts or a desire to win the argument by means of deception? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106593
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
