edwardthern wrote: > I see a pattern. > Since it is both solipsistic and ego centric, I have no doubt about that.
A bunch of angry people with avg gear and poor hearing [/quote wrote: > > > It would be reasonable at this time to provide reliable evidence that > you are not also afflicted with poor hearing and average gear. > > If you can't do that, you are being hypocritical, no? > > > > > > > hating on people with better gear and good hearing. > > > > > > A senseless claim because I know that I have less than the best gear > and at 70 and after chemotherapy, my hearing can reasonably be > expected to be 30 or more dB poorer than a young healthy person. > > > > > > > You can't hear it so you want to see it via measurements. Fact is, you > > can't even hear it when measurements are different. > > > > > > The fallacy here is that any different measurement is claimed to be > audible. Its maker is obviously ignorant or obfuscating what he knows > about the threshold of audibility. > > > > > > > > For example cat5 vs cat6 there were improvement in bandwidth, overall > > loss, and better signal to noise ratio per the STANDARD. so clearly they > > measure different, yet the mud ears got mad when people heard a > > difference.> > > > Ignores the fact that both CAT5 and CAT6 are sonically perfect for > most critical audiophile applications, providing reliable listening > tests are used. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106593 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
