[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> tarball. However, since there isn't (or we can't find) a stable >> release of aufs available, we are curious if you guys would mind >> us hosting a cvs snapshot on our server? > > Why do you (or people) think CVS as 'unstable snapshot?' > As I wrote in README file, I am trying keep CVS as stable version and > think it is 'release.' I call it 'Monday release'.
Ah, okay; I was not aware of your development model. My experience (and probably that of most others) is that cvs/svn/git/whatever code is unpredictable - due to new features being added, bugs being fixed, bugs being introduced by new features or other bugfixes, etcetera, we usually like to wait for a point in time where the developer(s) decide that the code is "release ready" and push out an incremented version number. > Anyway I, an aufs developer, don't mind that you make a tarball and put > it on your public ftp server. > But I'd recommend you to wait for next Monday release since I already > found a bug in the version 20080218. Thanks! I'll wait until Monday and pull a snapshot for testing and final commit on this end. -RW ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
