On Wednesday 08 December 2010 15:23:01 Xyne wrote: > I think the passage concerning "similar" proposals is too vague. There is > no way to define those terms in a way that is unambiguous in all cases and > trying to do so is futile and condemned to a pedantic spiral. > > I trust the human factor to handle those cases. People will be able to > determine whether it's the same proposal or not.
Okay, I don't intend to push this. I just think it would be nice to avoid any ambiguity where someone says that we have to wait 3 months e.g. to amend quorum, since a proposal to do that just failed, even though the second proposal might be slightly different. > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendment&oldid=124479 I'm happy with that. Want to propose it then? Pete.
