On Thursday 09 December 2010 00:45:33 Loui Chang wrote: > On Wed 08 Dec 2010 11:59 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Xyne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Let's wait another day to get some more comments and incorporate any > > > last changes. If it changes during the discussion period without > > > unanimous consent then we would end up in a grey area when deciding > > > which version to vote on (and we're limited by YES/NO proposals... > > > haha). > > > > Also if we are putting stuff like five day discussion section, seven day > > voting period, 66% quorum in the Standard Voting Procedure section, are > > we going to remove the redundant information in the other sections? As > > it stands now every section says 66% quorum. --Kaiting. > > I would leave them period, but definitely leave them for at least > another amendment.
Indeed. In most of the democratic organisations I've worked with, we'd usually agree one thing we wanted to change, then take a look afterwards to see how / if this impacted on other things, and change them to be consistent if needed. Pete.
