On Wed 08 Dec 2010 16:23 +0100, Xyne wrote: > I think the passage concerning "similar" proposals is too vague. There > is no way to define those terms in a way that is unambiguous in all > cases and trying to do so is futile and condemned to a pedantic > spiral. > > I trust the human factor to handle those cases. People will be able to > determine whether it's the same proposal or not. > > I've removed that passage, changed "bylaws" to "by-laws", and changed "YES / > NO" to "YES or NO".
I would prefer the non hyphenated spelling. *shrug* > As Loui pointed out, we should agree on a final version soon. I currently > support this version: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendment&oldid=124479 Yeah we're starting to lump too many changes into one amendment.
