On April 4, 2018 4:49 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 04:37 PM, Jordan Glover wrote: > > > > The point is that the community package which doesn't build manually and > > > > point to nonexistent sources is the one which should be deleted instead of > > > > the one from AUR. If you prefer that upstream Archlinux instructions will > > look > > > > the same as those for Ubuntu/Debian[*] then it will be done but it would > > mean > > > > that Archlinux project in current form is a joke and you role in it isn't > > worth a > > > > dime. > > The package in [community] will be updated soon. > > > > > Jordan > > Regards, Rob I'm sorry for the harsh words. If those requests were made AFTER update package in repo there won't be this conversation. I found situation where killing other people efforts to make things work, unacceptable without providing an alternative. Common sense should prevail the rules. Jordan
