Lets get real here, it is a well known fact, and stated on this forum many 
times previously that AEF's result in few new members to gliding, in fact often 
they just clog up the day but we do them in the hope that maybe this one will 
join.
 
At my club we have a fairly simple way of charging for these flights, work out 
what it will cost "worst case" for the launch, add the cost of the glider, add 
a bit for the fudge factor, add a bit for profit, then add the GFA fee whether 
it be $1 or $20. 
 
Any club that says that the $20 GFA fee is taken from the club needs to look at 
its administration as they are not doing their job properly as an AEF should 
not cost the members but should profit them. Most people who take an  AEF do so 
for the experience only and will pay whatever is asked, I  have seen flights 
charged at $150 and the club is still kept busy doing flights.
K



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:02:40 
+1000Subject: [Aus-soaring] AEF Charges - $20 to GFA




 
AEF’s are a main source of revenue for some clubs in both dollars and 
attracting new members.  This is a blatant grab for club dollars by GFA, taking 
revenue straight out of the clubs.
 
In small clubs the cost of operating will most likely be in the red and are 
being propped up by donations from members (buying fuel for winch, food for 
fund raising BQ, etc out of their own pocket).  Now their revenue is cut more 
even more.  I thought that GFA was here to support it’s members and encourage 
gliding, not to make a profit out of our sport.
 
In today’s economy every organisation has to reduce cost, yes even GFA, if we 
are to survive.
 
So what is going to happen in the future?  Fees are going up, therefore 
membership will decline, cost per member will go up, thus fees go up, more 
members leave and the vicious circle has begun.
 
The answer is to keep reducing costs per member to attract growth this is 
simple business logic.
 
Don’t get me wrong, I think that GFA staff and board members are helpful and 
doing a job which many of us could not do (or would not do).  And a lot of it 
at their cost.
 
But we still need turn around spending by GFA.  The answer is definitely not to 
keep slugging the members and clubs.
 
Barry Kruyssen
_________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to