standard route policy: bits you pay me for > bits I get for free > bits I pay for.
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Pieter Berkel <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt and Gavin are right: this asymmetric routing seems to only impacts > providers that buy transit from HE in SJC (TPG and Vocus being the two main > ones I've noticed). It would appear from the below post that HE policy is > to preference transit over peering links (presuming that AS paths for both > are the same length?): > > https://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=81&topicid=233 > 763&page_no=2#2006292 > > (Although I'm not quite sure how the reverse might break routing, it might > break their business model?). I guess it's up to Vocus & TPG to figure out > how fix if it becomes a problem for them. > > Edwin: there is some merit to having a routable /48 to experiment with, > not sure if Internode supply that sort of IPv6 subnet to ADSL customers? > > > > On 16 May 2018 at 09:05, Dave Browning <[email protected]> wrote: > >> All good if on MegaIX SYD >> >> Tracing route to tserv1.syd1.he.net [216.218.142.50] >> over a maximum of 30 hops: >> >> 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms vl666.cr01.b1.bne.qld.au.sentrian.net.au >> [103.226.9.138] >> 2 15 ms 16 ms 14 ms vl3.cr01.s1.syd.nsw.au.sentrian.net.au >> [103.226.9.245] >> 3 13 ms 16 ms 14 ms as6939.sydney.megaport.com >> [103.26.68.236] >> 4 12 ms 19 ms 15 ms tserv1.syd1.he.net [216.218.142.50] >> >> Dave Browning | Network Engineer >> P 1300 791 678 >> Level 1, 12 Railway Tce, Milton QLD 4064 >> _______________________________________________ >> AusNOG mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >> > > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
