2016-11-09 11:35:37 +0000, Andrew Josey: [...] > This does flag a question to me about whether adding new terms > goes beyond the true scope of a TC ( one to discuss another > time) [...]
Note that it's not only those terms. Some whole sections have been added. Compare http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2013edition/basedefs/V1_chap04.html and http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html And the text is different including the meaning. For instance, I'm sure I've given links to the shell grammar to show "for i; do" was not standard. And that link now shows it is standard (if it points at the grammar at all). I would rather it points to the original version of the spec I was refering to at the time with a mention that that spec is now obsolete. > The old version is available at: > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2013edition [...] Thanks, I can update my links to point to that instead of the web.archive.org snapshot. Would it be possible to have a http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2016edition as well (link to the current http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799) so we can link to that now without the links becoming broken when the next edition comes out? Thanks, Stephane
