2016-11-09 11:35:37 +0000, Andrew Josey:
> This does flag a question to me about whether adding new terms
> goes beyond the true scope of a TC ( one to discuss another
> time)

Note that it's not only those terms. Some whole sections have been
added. Compare


And the text is different including the meaning. For instance,
I'm sure I've given links to the shell grammar to show
"for i; do" was not standard. And that link now shows it is
standard (if it points at the grammar at all). I would rather it
points to the original version of the spec I was refering to
at the time with a mention that that spec is now obsolete.

> The old version is available at:
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2013edition


I can update my links to point to that instead of the
web.archive.org snapshot.

Would it be possible to have a
as well (link to the current
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799) so we can link
to that now without the links becoming broken when the next
edition comes out?


Reply via email to