On Tue, 21 Apr 2020, Robert Elz wrote: > Probably not, it was an interpretation of the 1992 standard, and so > was probably not earlier than 1993 (I see some 1996 copyrights, but wjether > that's for the specific interpretation or just the collection I don't know).
I received that interpretation response in an email from Andrew Josey dated Tue, 18 Nov 1997 13:47:59 +0000 (having sent the original interpretation request in an email dated Sat, 4 Oct 1997 22:21:55 +0100). After the response text that I linked to in my previous message, that email says: Notes to the editor (not part of this interpretation): ----------------------------------------------------- For item B above, add the phrase "other than alias substitution" on line 58-59 after "recursively" worded appropriately. Forwarded to Interpretations group: October 8 1997 Proposed resolution: Oct 14 1997 Finalised: Nov 18 1997 [and then the email continues with a WG15 Status Block] -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
