A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=697 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                steffen
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1
Issue ID:                   697
Category:                   System Interfaces
Type:                       Clarification Requested
Severity:                   Comment
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       Steffen Nurpmeso 
Organization:                
User Reference:              
Section:                    none 
Page Number:                none 
Line Number:                none 
Interp Status:              --- 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2013-05-15 10:31 UTC
Last Modified:              2020-10-03 12:53 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Adding of a getdirentries() function
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0000696 either NAME_MAX shouldn't be optional, ...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0005022) dennisw (reporter) - 2020-10-03 12:53
 https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=697#c5022 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I think the specification should make it explicit under which circumstances
(if any) the application can rely on posix_getdents() to return the current
state of the directory.
Right now it only says that it is unspecified when a sequence of
posix_getdents() calls reads the entire directory.
Is posix_getdents() guaranteed to return the current state after an lseek()
to the beginning?

Also in the second last paragraph of the DESCRIPTION, there should be no
parentheses after fildes. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2013-05-15 10:31 steffen        New Issue                                    
2013-05-15 10:31 steffen        Name                      => Steffen Nurpmeso
2013-05-15 10:31 steffen        Section                   => none            
2013-05-15 10:31 steffen        Page Number               => none            
2013-05-15 10:31 steffen        Line Number               => none            
2013-05-15 22:08 jilles         Note Added: 0001607                          
2013-05-16 10:22 steffen        Note Added: 0001608                          
2013-05-30 15:37 eblake         Relationship added       related to 0000696  
2013-05-30 15:57 geoffclare     Note Added: 0001629                          
2014-03-30 00:33 sstewartgallus Issue Monitored: sstewartgallus                 
  
2020-08-28 08:21 geoffclare     Note Added: 0004947                          
2020-08-28 08:27 geoffclare     Note Edited: 0004947                         
2020-08-28 17:07 shware_systems Note Added: 0004948                          
2020-08-28 17:52 kre            Note Added: 0004949                          
2020-08-28 22:42 philip-guentherNote Added: 0004952                          
2020-08-28 22:52 philip-guentherNote Added: 0004953                          
2020-08-29 11:34 shware_systems Note Added: 0004955                          
2020-08-29 11:34 shware_systems Note Added: 0004956                          
2020-08-29 11:41 shware_systems Note Edited: 0004956                         
2020-08-29 11:44 shware_systems Note Deleted: 0004955                        
2020-08-29 13:07 shware_systems Note Added: 0004957                          
2020-08-29 13:11 shware_systems Note Edited: 0004957                         
2020-08-30 23:06 philip-guentherNote Added: 0004958                          
2020-08-30 23:11 philip-guentherNote Added: 0004959                          
2020-08-30 23:44 shware_systems Note Added: 0004960                          
2020-10-02 09:00 geoffclare     Note Edited: 0004947                         
2020-10-02 09:11 geoffclare     Note Added: 0005016                          
2020-10-03 12:53 dennisw        Note Added: 0005022                          
======================================================================


  • RE: [1003.1(... shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • RE: [10... Wojtek Lerch via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • RE: [1003.1(... shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • RE: [10... Wojtek Lerch via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • Re: [1003.1(... shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • RE: [1003.1(... shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • RE: [10... Wojtek Lerch via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • RE: [1003.1(... shwaresyst via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: [10... Wojtek Lerch via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [1003.1(2013... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Overflo... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • RE:... Wojtek Lerch via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • ... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
          • ... Wojtek Lerch via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • ... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to