On 2/19/21 11:22 AM, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
Yes, rule 4 is applied there, but your mistake is in assuming that
the *result* of rule 4 is that the token is converted to an Esac.
How is it not? "the [sic] TOKEN is exactly the reserved word esac" at this
point. Why would it not return the token for `esac'? Or are you saying that
is not converted to an Esac?
Harald made essentially the same point in his last mail - see my reply
to that.
Yeah, I hadn't gotten there yet.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU [email protected] http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
