David and coauthors,
Thank you for your reply, David; your information has been updated as
requested. A reference question:
Should draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd be a normative reference because of the "MUST"
in the "For IPv6" sentence in Section 2.3 (pasted below)? We note that draft is
currently in AUTH48 state as RFC-to-be 9870. If you make the reference
normative, then this document will refer to it by RFC number, and they will be
published at the same time.
Inner IP header:
Destination IP: The IP address MUST be set to the loopback
address 127.0.0.1/32 for IPv4 version. For IPv6, the address
MUST be selected from the Dummy IPv6 Prefix 100:0:0:1::/64
[P2MP-BFD].
For background, "Normative references specify documents that must be read to
understand or implement the technology in the new RFC, or whose technology must
be present for the technology in the new RFC to work." -- quoting the IESG
statement
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-iesg-statement-normative-and-informative-references-20060419/).
Re: David's updates
The revised files are here (please refresh):
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.pdf
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.xml
This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-diff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
This diff file shows only the changes since the last posted version:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-lastrfcdiff.html
Re:
> With those changes, I approve the resulting document.
We have recorded your approval. This page shows the AUTH48 status
of your document:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9772
Thank you.
RFC Editor/ar
> On May 6, 2025, at 1:03 PM, Black, David <david.bl...@dell.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alice,
>
> I have reviewed the document and the changes made by the RFC Editor. All of
> the changes are fine – the RFC Editor has done the usual thorough job of
> editing, and your attention to the details is greatly appreciated.
>
> Please change my affiliation from “Dell EMC” to “Dell” and remove the
> physical/postal mail address (“176 South Street Hopkinton, MA, 01748 United
> States of America”). With those changes, I approve the resulting document.
>
> Thanks, --David
>
> From: Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 5, 2025 4:59 PM
> To: Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) <gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>
> Cc: Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org>; sbout...@ciena.com; Black,
> David <david.bl...@dell.com>; santosh.pallaga...@gmail.com;
> nvo3-...@ietf.org; nvo3-cha...@ietf.org; Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
> <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>; auth48archive@rfc-ed
> <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; RFC Editor <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>
> Subject: Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9772 <draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-16>
> for your review
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Hi Alice,
> to get on the record, I approve it.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
--
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
