I’m good with the changes and with the current state of the document.

Thanks,

Sami

From: Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 at 5:03 PM
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com>
Cc: Black, David <david.bl...@dell.com>, Boutros, Sami <sbout...@ciena.com>, 
santosh.pallaga...@gmail.com <santosh.pallaga...@gmail.com>, nvo3-...@ietf.org 
<nvo3-...@ietf.org>, nvo3-cha...@ietf.org <nvo3-cha...@ietf.org>, Matthew Bocci 
(Nokia) <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>, Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) 
<gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>, auth48archive@rfc-ed 
<auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9772 
<draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-16> for your review
Greg,

Thank you for your reply. This document has been updated accordingly and will 
be published with RFC-to-be 9780 (when approvals of both documents are 
complete).

This diff file shows only the changes since the last posted version (please 
refresh):
  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-lastrfcdiff.html__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV3VCJHndg$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-lastrfcdiff.html__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV3VCJHndg$>
 [rfc-editor[.]org]

The URLs are the same as below.

RFC Editor/ar

> On May 6, 2025, at 1:29 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alice,
> thank you for your question. I think that the appropriate level of reference 
> to draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd is normative.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 1:23 PM Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org> 
> wrote:
> David and coauthors,
>
> Thank you for your reply, David; your information has been updated as 
> requested. A reference question:
>
> Should draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd be a normative reference because of the 
> "MUST" in the "For IPv6" sentence in Section 2.3 (pasted below)? We note that 
> draft is currently in AUTH48 state as RFC-to-be 9870. If you make the 
> reference normative, then this document will refer to it by RFC number, and 
> they will be published at the same time.
>
>    Inner IP header:
>       Destination IP:  The IP address MUST be set to the loopback
>          address 127.0.0.1/32 for IPv4 version.  For IPv6, the address
>          MUST be selected from the Dummy IPv6 Prefix 100:0:0:1::/64
>          [P2MP-BFD].
>
> For background, "Normative references specify documents that must be read to 
> understand or implement the technology in the new RFC, or whose technology 
> must be present for the technology in the new RFC to work." -- quoting the 
> IESG statement 
> (https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-iesg-statement-normative-and-informative-references-20060419/__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV1XviQQNg$
>  [datatracker[.]ietf[.]org]).
>
>
> Re: David's updates
>
> The revised files are here (please refresh):
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.html__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV1MwtW0lQ$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.html__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV1MwtW0lQ$>
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.txt__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV2IabxwUw$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.txt__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV2IabxwUw$>
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.pdf__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV1Kh-CzpA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.pdf__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV1Kh-CzpA$>
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.xml__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV2vLacmcQ$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772.xml__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV2vLacmcQ$>
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>
> This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D:
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-diff.html__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV3yJ7PXvA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-diff.html__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV3yJ7PXvA$>
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-rfcdiff.html__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV20xZDyRQ$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-rfcdiff.html__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV20xZDyRQ$>
>  [rfc-editor[.]org] (side by side)
>
> This diff file shows only the changes since the last posted version:
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-lastrfcdiff.html__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV3VCJHndg$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9772-lastrfcdiff.html__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV3VCJHndg$>
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>
> Re:
> > With those changes, I approve the resulting document.
>
> We have recorded your approval. This page shows the AUTH48 status
> of your document:
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9772__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV1MbmFVwA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9772__;!!OSsGDw!IUDC0cfb3PBhLvVLLW4DpMWgwbG4XhxczHE7a7dj_ne3g0gOmJZLm5_o4o028ZQ2K1vy0lODR2tNAV1MbmFVwA$>
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>
> Thank you.
> RFC Editor/ar
-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to