Rebecca,
I approve of publication.
/Loa
Den 19/06/2025 kl. 22:50, skrev Rebecca VanRheenen:
Hi Adrian, authors, and Jim*,
Adrian - Thank you for providing the updated text. We have updated the files
accordingly (see list of files below)
Authors - Please let us know if you approve of the document in its current form
or if any further updates are needed.
*Jim - As AD, please review the changes to the definitions for "MPLS Payload” and
"Post-Stack Header (PSH)” in Section 1.2 and let us know if you approve. These
changes are best viewed in this diff file:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790-lastdiff.html.
— FILES (please refresh) —
Updated XML file:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790.xml
Updated output files:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790.pdf
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790.html
Diff file showing changes made during AUTH48:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790-auth48diff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff
between last version and this)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between
last version and this)
Diff files showing all changes:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790-diff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790-alt-diff.html (diff showing
changes where text is moved or deleted)
For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9790
Thank you,
RFC Editor/rv
On Jun 18, 2025, at 1:20 PM, Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
RFC Editor (Rebecca), authors, Working Group,
Document Shepherd here.
This document seemed to stagnate over the discussion of a couple of minor
editorial points. So I have been chatting with Greg and Loa, and we have agreed
some changes that seem to address the concerns.
I have based these changes on the text at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9790.txt
Section 1.2
OLD
MPLS Payload: All data after the label stack and the optional Post-
Stack header.
NEW
MPLS Payload: All data after the label stack and any optional PSHs. It
is possible that more than one type of PSH may be present in a
packet, and some PSH specifications might allow multiple PSHs of
the same type. The presence rules for multiple PSHs are a matter
for the documents that define those PSHs, e.g., in
[I-D.ietf-mpls-mna-ps-hdr].
END
Section 1.2
OLD
Post-Stack Header (PSH): A field containing information that may be
of interest to the egress Label Switching Router (LSR) or transit
LSRs. Examples include a control word [RFC4385] [RFC8964] or an
associated channel header [RFC4385] [RFC5586] [RFC9546]. A parser
needs to be able to determine where the PSH ends in order to find
the embedded packet.
NEW
Post-Stack Header (PSH): A field containing information that may be
of interest to the egress Label Switching Router (LSR) or transit
LSRs. Examples include a control word [RFC4385] [RFC8964] or an
associated channel header [RFC4385] [RFC5586] [RFC9546].
END
I hope with these two changes, all of the authors can confirm their AUTH48
proposal.
Regards,
Adrian
--
Loa Andersson
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting
l...@pi.nu
loa.pi....@gmail.com
--
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
