Hi David, Thank you for your response! To clarify, should the document only reference RFC 9810 instead of both RFCs? If yes, we will remove RFC 9811 from the Informative References section (and from the updated text below).
Thank you! Madison Church RFC Production Center > On Dec 11, 2025, at 3:40 PM, David von Oheimb <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Madison, > just a quick direct answer from me being co-author of the recent CMP RFCs: > On 11.12.25 19:28, Madison Church wrote: >> 2) We have replaced RFC 9480 with RFCs 9810 and 9811. Note that we have >> updated the text below as follows to reflect this change. Please let us know >> any objections. >> >> Original: >> A similar method has been defined in CMP Updates [RFC9480] and the >> Lightweight CMP profile [RFC9483], Section 4.3.3, using a CSR >> template as defined for CRMF [RFC4211]. >> >> Current: >> A similar method has been defined in "Internet X.509 Public Key >> Infrastructure -- Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)" [RFC9810], >> "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- HTTP Transfer for the >> Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)" [RFC9811], and "Lightweight >> Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Profile" ([RFC9483], >> Section 4.3.3) using a CSR template as defined for CRMF [RFC4211]. > Thank you for updating the CMP reference(s). > Yet here the reference to RFC 9811 (which is just about HTTP transfer for > CMP) is not relevant. > So please change to: > A similar method has been defined in "Internet X.509 Public Key > Infrastructure -- Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)" [RFC9810] > and the "Lightweight Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Profile" > ([RFC9483], Section 4.3.3) using a CSR template as defined for CRMF [RFC4211]. > > Regards, > David > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
