On 15.12.25 18:31, Michael Richardson wrote:
Madison Church<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you for your response! To clarify, should the document only
> reference RFC 9810 instead of both RFCs? If yes, we will remove RFC
> 9811 from the Informative References section (and from the updated text
> below).
Yes, I think with the split in the (CMP) documents, that only 9810 need be
referenced.
Correct.
@Madison, as I tried to explain on Dec 11, the document should not
reference RFC 9811 because it is only about HTTP transfer of CMP
messages, which is not relevant at that point.
We should reference in this paragraph only RFCs 9810, 9483, and 4211. As
written, my concrete suggestion for adapting the paragraph is:
A similar method has been defined in "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure -- Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)" [RFC9810]
and the "Lightweight Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Profile"
([RFC9483], Section 4.3.3) using a CSR template as defined for CRMF [RFC4211].
David
--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
