Madison Church <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for your response! To clarify, should the document only > reference RFC 9810 instead of both RFCs? If yes, we will remove RFC > 9811 from the Informative References section (and from the updated text > below).
Yes, I think with the split in the (CMP) documents, that only 9810 need be referenced. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
