I approve, these changes look good to me.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 11:05 AM Madison Church < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Authors, *Orie, > > *Orie - Please review the updates in Sections 4.7, 5.3, 5.4, and 6.3 and > let us know if you approve. The changes can be viewed in this diff file: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-lastdiff.html. > > Carsten - Thank you for your reply! We have made your requested updates > and believe there are no remaining questions that are outstanding. > > Authors - Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as > we do not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us > with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its > current form. We will await approvals from each author prior to moving > forward in the publication process. > > The files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.xml > > The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-diff.html (comprehensive > changes) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 > changes) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by > side) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-lastdiff.html (most recent > AUTH48 changes) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-lastrfcdiff.html (side by > side) > > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9880. > > Thank you! > Madison Church > RFC Production Center > > > > On Jan 9, 2026, at 11:22 AM, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 6, 2026, at 22:05, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Below are the remaining nits I found. > > > > There is one more: > > > > We do use the term SDF specification, and it may not be clear how that > relates to the terms SDF Model and SDF Document. > > We could clarify this in the definition of SDF Model: > > > > OLD: > > > > SDF Model: Definitions and declarations that model the digital > > interaction opportunities offered by one or more kinds of Things, > > represented by Groupings (sdfObjects and sdfThings). An SDF Model > > can be fully contained in a single SDF Document, or it can be > > built from an SDF Document that references definitions and > > declarations from additional SDF documents. > > > > NEW: > > (Existing text, plus:). > > The term SDF Specification can be used when the distinction between > > the distribution into individual SDF Documents and > > the abstract nature of the SDF Model is not of interest. > > > > Grüße, Carsten >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
