Hi Authors, Orie, Thank you all for your prompt replies and approvals! We have marked them on the AUTH48 status page (see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9880).
We will now send updates along to IANA. Thank you! Madison Church RFC Production Center > On Jan 14, 2026, at 10:58 PM, Michael Koster <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I approve the document in its current form. > > Michael Koster > >> On Jan 14, 2026, at 9:04 AM, Madison Church <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Authors, *Orie, >> >> *Orie - Please review the updates in Sections 4.7, 5.3, 5.4, and 6.3 and let >> us know if you approve. The changes can be viewed in this diff file: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-lastdiff.html. >> >> Carsten - Thank you for your reply! We have made your requested updates and >> believe there are no remaining questions that are outstanding. >> >> Authors - Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we >> do not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with >> any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current >> form. We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in >> the publication process. >> >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.xml >> >> The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-diff.html (comprehensive changes) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 >> changes) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-lastdiff.html (most recent >> AUTH48 changes) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> >> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9880. >> >> Thank you! >> Madison Church >> RFC Production Center >> >> >>> On Jan 9, 2026, at 11:22 AM, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 6, 2026, at 22:05, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Below are the remaining nits I found. >>> >>> There is one more: >>> >>> We do use the term SDF specification, and it may not be clear how that >>> relates to the terms SDF Model and SDF Document. >>> We could clarify this in the definition of SDF Model: >>> >>> OLD: >>> >>> SDF Model: Definitions and declarations that model the digital >>> interaction opportunities offered by one or more kinds of Things, >>> represented by Groupings (sdfObjects and sdfThings). An SDF Model >>> can be fully contained in a single SDF Document, or it can be >>> built from an SDF Document that references definitions and >>> declarations from additional SDF documents. >>> >>> NEW: >>> (Existing text, plus:). >>> The term SDF Specification can be used when the distinction between >>> the distribution into individual SDF Documents and >>> the abstract nature of the SDF Model is not of interest. >>> >>> Grüße, Carsten > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
