I approve the document in its current form. Michael Koster
> On Jan 14, 2026, at 9:04 AM, Madison Church <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Authors, *Orie, > > *Orie - Please review the updates in Sections 4.7, 5.3, 5.4, and 6.3 and let > us know if you approve. The changes can be viewed in this diff file: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-lastdiff.html. > > Carsten - Thank you for your reply! We have made your requested updates and > believe there are no remaining questions that are outstanding. > > Authors - Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we > do not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any > further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We > will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the > publication process. > > The files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880.xml > > The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-diff.html (comprehensive changes) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 > changes) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-lastdiff.html (most recent > AUTH48 changes) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9880-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) > > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9880. > > Thank you! > Madison Church > RFC Production Center > > >> On Jan 9, 2026, at 11:22 AM, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Jan 6, 2026, at 22:05, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Below are the remaining nits I found. >> >> There is one more: >> >> We do use the term SDF specification, and it may not be clear how that >> relates to the terms SDF Model and SDF Document. >> We could clarify this in the definition of SDF Model: >> >> OLD: >> >> SDF Model: Definitions and declarations that model the digital >> interaction opportunities offered by one or more kinds of Things, >> represented by Groupings (sdfObjects and sdfThings). An SDF Model >> can be fully contained in a single SDF Document, or it can be >> built from an SDF Document that references definitions and >> declarations from additional SDF documents. >> >> NEW: >> (Existing text, plus:). >> The term SDF Specification can be used when the distinction between >> the distribution into individual SDF Documents and >> the abstract nature of the SDF Model is not of interest. >> >> Grüße, Carsten -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
