Hi, Jim.  Many thanks for the prompt reply!  So noted:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9893

Thanks again!

Lynne Bartholomew
RFC Production Center

> On Jan 26, 2026, at 9:55 AM, James Guichard <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> approved.
> 
> From: Lynne Bartholomew <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, January 26, 2026 at 12:30 PM
> To: Eric Kinzie <[email protected]>, James Guichard 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, Lou Berger <[email protected]>, 
> [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] 
> <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, 
> [email protected] <[email protected]>, 
> [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9893 
> <draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control-19> for your review
> 
> Dear Eric and *AD (Jim),
> 
> Eric, we have made this update.
> 
> * Jim, please review the latest update in Section 1, where a "MAY" has been 
> added, and let us know if you approve.
> 
> The latest files are posted here.  Please refresh your browser:
> 
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382572606%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rSZ1Rs9er%2BWLYIgma33y2cusgtuABWUV2IKMdC6%2B8dE%3D&reserved=0
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382607466%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qNQMjghxjjgwWYNcFhdaxWhfQHEA6RqGrP5axn9olLk%3D&reserved=0
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382647229%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=91P7NNrGCd0RSmqhwPveYLLSjPjf4LOzWEHQJ7f1TAs%3D&reserved=0
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382664887%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=uW3hHnPOomSPdkjYAVQoqIsoe6ck4Z744xrPTwW6B0A%3D&reserved=0
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382681258%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PgFwYRTzvKWI4D7gsTvbMpSK1d2cEcU1M6CdovnTMXk%3D&reserved=0
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382696706%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=B%2F6cUMVs4SjhpfNzN7V%2FpBIH3q%2Fi4FcVkBJKJcj%2BH7w%3D&reserved=0
>  (side by side)
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382712208%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5nfg%2FGCaqQnn1B7hbsydemo%2BAxIWYhDSMvrr49P8csc%3D&reserved=0
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382727074%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Rx05TQfBCpKMXCgpYFbn126yrhYHiRlASEiQp%2BLRru8%3D&reserved=0
>  (side by side)
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382741282%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=D4zO3PtAAbVWStnPtsPcg1mBzIV3vc2lYj5PgiDdspw%3D&reserved=0
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-lastrfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382755280%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=2IBWFF5b2m1cv%2FXIownPp59iP68pB95kJfJzOs%2FweYs%3D&reserved=0
>  (side by side)
> 
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-xmldiff1.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382769431%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=tiBPJSg3ygv%2F8LQNbmJlS8NLgiO3oW0YhvxjlwcV45c%3D&reserved=0
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-xmldiff2.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382802850%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0Ok2zZMsiNJWTacZqgHQjXWvRHwW2%2Bmz4y0XGnb0lyY%3D&reserved=0
>    
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382820546%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=HcUah8uLCMb6yDEzsbPCmm3vY7EGVg5%2BMSFXcJTw5zc%3D&reserved=0
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Lynne Bartholomew
> RFC Production Center
> 
> > On Jan 23, 2026, at 12:52 PM, Eric Kinzie <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Lynne,
> >
> >>> Should "Traffic Classification Data Items provided by the modem are" be 
> >>> "The Traffic Classification Data Item provided by the modem is" or 
> >>> possibly "Traffic Classification Sub-Data Items provided by the modem 
> >>> are"?  Or does the text refer to multiple instances of the Traffic 
> >>> Classification Data Item defined in RFC 9892 (in which case perhaps this 
> >>> should be clarified)?
> >
> > There can be multiple instances of the Traffic Classification Data Item.
> > Possibly:
> >
> > "The Traffic Classification Data Item provided by the modem is defined
> > in [RFC9892]. In this case, a flow is identified based on information
> > found in a data plane header, and one or more matches are associated
> > with a single flow.  As stated in [RFC8982], more than one Data Item
> > MAY be included in a message to provide information on multiple traffic
> > classifiers.  Refer to" . . .
> >
> > I think the wording of the second location you pointed out is ok.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eric
> >
> > On Mon Jan 05 10:11:22 -0800 2026, Lynne Bartholomew wrote:
> >> Dear authors,
> >>
> >> Happy New Year!
> >>
> >> We could not find a reply to the following questions.  Apologies if we 
> >> missed it.  Please advise.
> >>
> >> Thank you!
> >>
> >> Lynne Bartholomew
> >> RFC Production Center
> >>
> >>> On Dec 23, 2025, at 3:03 PM, Lynne Bartholomew 
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello again.  Forgot to mention that we also see the following text 
> >>> elsewhere in this document:
> >>>
> >>> based on the Traffic Classification Data Item defined in
> >>> [RFC9892]
> >>> ...
> >>> flow
> >>> identification information provided by modems in the Traffic
> >>> Classification Data Item defined in [RFC9892]
> >>> ...
> >>> flow identifier as defined by the Traffic Classification
> >>> Data Item [RFC9892]
> >>>
> >>> Thank you.
> >>>
> >>> Lynne Bartholomew
> >>> RFC Production Center
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 23, 2025, at 2:56 PM, Lynne Bartholomew 
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dear authors,
> >>>
> >>> Apologies for not spotting this earlier:  We see the following text in 
> >>> this document:
> >>>
> >>> Traffic Classification Data Items provided by the modem are defined in 
> >>> [RFC9892].
> >>>
> >>> However, it appears that RFC 9892 only defines one Traffic Classification 
> >>> Data Item.  Please note that it also defines two Sub-Data Items.
> >>>
> >>> Should "Traffic Classification Data Items provided by the modem are" be 
> >>> "The Traffic Classification Data Item provided by the modem is" or 
> >>> possibly "Traffic Classification Sub-Data Items provided by the modem 
> >>> are"?  Or does the text refer to multiple instances of the Traffic 
> >>> Classification Data Item defined in RFC 9892 (in which case perhaps this 
> >>> should be clarified)?
> >>>
> >>> Thank you.
> >>>
> >>> Lynne Bartholomew
> >>> RFC Production Center
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Dec 22, 2025, at 8:53 AM, Lynne Bartholomew 
> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi, Eric and Bow-Nan.
> >>>>
> >>>> We have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 status page:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9893&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382837512%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Vf7HPXVQ%2FN4NOg5jhJaQfOz1O%2FrGt00%2BDMYtLo1Bd3s%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>
> >>>> As this document normatively depends on RFC-to-be 9892, it will be 
> >>>> published when RFC-to-be 9892 is published.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you!
> >>>>
> >>>> Lynne Bartholomew
> >>>> RFC Production Center
> >>>>
> >>>>> From: "Cheng, Bow-Nan - 0662 - MITLL" <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9893 
> >>>>> <draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control-19> for your review
> >>>>> Date: December 18, 2025 at 6:13:07 PM PST
> >>>>> To: Lynne Bartholomew <[email protected]>, Eric Kinzie 
> >>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Cc: Lou Berger <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" 
> >>>>> <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 
> >>>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 
> >>>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 
> >>>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 
> >>>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm fine with this document moving forward -- thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Dec 18, 2025, at 4:15 PM, Eric Kinzie <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lynne,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I approve this document in its current form.  No further updates needed 
> >>>>> for me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Eric
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon Dec 15 10:42:42 -0800 2025, Lynne Bartholomew wrote:
> >>>>>> Dear Bow-Nan and Eric,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A reminder that we do not believe that we have heard from you 
> >>>>>> regarding the status of this document.  Please let us know whether 
> >>>>>> further updates are needed or you approve this document for 
> >>>>>> publication in its current form.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The latest files are posted here.  Please refresh your browser:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382852709%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lHlzoGR0VVKgFNVSw%2BsA1Ce%2FEBi0YfDOD9e7fSz%2BPgo%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382868957%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UgMhsvC8TlQ7jbqRRbtYz1w65e%2FzgPlKOk3buiO9i7s%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382884233%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cewuDNPMMEY5cNYdPtr53V6qJSIhdoWcUPP1hFtwd3Y%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382899117%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=S67g0rmUjY4uCuzzndaDVI8V7eSaXNrWvEuKKaN22Po%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382913858%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=q9kMSmIF4POI3CrpOD1GoC%2BHfcA1Tn7qipdhyT82LN8%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382928728%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=OjoEOxxpKe0ENT%2FROKkk2XYY8O1778Z8LtZnGGq7nfg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382950653%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QT7ngOCA%2FTM7RDGDLQJXWPvo8D%2FGLvCBIOcpjOm8jBE%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382966554%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=R3cv3T3dcL%2BjDDhqieXKuDYkkPCEnnhgxupog1t1Odc%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382980726%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=hQRelxIAuO%2FRF820AtICD29%2BPOqLyNjIe791%2FzcF80k%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-lastrfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454382995238%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cwJz4ZUj1MlLlCZ2EFafEgishDf%2FT4NjwnqLj%2FmiJhg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-xmldiff1.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383009231%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9bX2JNU00L8VeTudMe9V11Nah%2BfEyvTCdy1qlb3KN7w%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-xmldiff2.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383023194%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9x%2BPdNbrqvSCldFnpTz5Rz99ZZO%2BClpqS8gTPQgOIaY%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383037651%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EZ%2Byp4yg%2FebsljDH7XOTk1lvxuLkhoZBobjo1LBakcQ%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The AUTH48 status page is here:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9893&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383054058%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jpZ6d9TQoPPqMHd5ya9VTrC6X%2FAove%2BIn9CCdJrc%2ByQ%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew
> >>>>>> RFC Production Center
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2025, at 4:13 PM, Lynne Bartholomew 
> >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi, Lou.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9893&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383070564%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XXqY0yadYWENapJBzAygGpzp%2B8WTK44AlI8Tt%2Bvz3UM%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks to you as well!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew
> >>>>>>> RFC Production Center
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Dec 8, 2025, at 3:29 PM, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The document looks good to me.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thank you for all the work!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Lou
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 12/8/2025 1:25 PM, Lynne Bartholomew wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Dear Bow-Nan, Lou, and Eric,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Checking in with you regarding the status of this document.  Please 
> >>>>>>>>> let us know whether further updates are needed or you approve this 
> >>>>>>>>> document for publication in its current form.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The latest files are posted here.  Please refresh your browser:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383085596%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LE96m9%2B7Ic%2FjSjup4Q7gDsoRPyyr0w3KRfYTjXGitcU%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383130990%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lzviJiUkeO8sZ%2BMkBjJhjxokIwQ4b3vCbwITgus6%2BQ0%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383149541%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gEdeipWeOA2R5KUJo1eyIC5M4TYDwlLlkDO8QclQTHc%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383164663%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GIyJhZXGHvW%2F3njVV108HJjUjs9MWb2KDf2wMjesvmI%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383180080%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gzHCoU6qESe6ob7laAnUvTS1K4ESNUBskykR%2BNUlqME%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383194412%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fXcPhIIXvkB%2BQxKwmL%2FSLA%2BBJPk97dxQa4MXyrg9%2BbI%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383209902%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5ytskAKwRQ1rzfUkf3bfFFR8XzYaFIkaRYGZ6DI%2Bvuo%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383223706%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9QvBuO6OaLigaUayGhEG%2BqhHLQUYPh6SOJAtsSxMcpU%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383237360%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qC2ONh5OHTe25NV92uUP3LE3ZQpWHK7n0CxxZF87rzQ%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-lastrfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383268164%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MkLH2DUjjKDmzqVufkq%2Fqf3pk%2ByIzxTzd1ioU%2FiNeWQ%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-xmldiff1.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383294440%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ShzwIeVmzk2Sz%2FuBsiI39tzz2VFMO0qxIWVLX6h%2FP5c%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-xmldiff2.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383315667%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rwE1ezWQl%2FugE6m3ZEAEq45sQi%2F5U0Ly%2BEvopFQ9zX8%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383329606%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Re3C%2F%2FtuBlSe%2Fq9nFONGX0e2aJEhL1UZuLoBm2BYyfE%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The AUTH48 status page is here:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9893&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383342643%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fWyGOHxtmfiFXVbrmDltWcAG2AoNIx%2FW5bpZLpmCGCA%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thank you!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew
> >>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 3, 2025, at 9:03 AM, Lynne Bartholomew 
> >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Eric.  Thanks for your prompt reply to our follow-up items!  
> >>>>>>>>>> We have changed '"Credit Window Initialization"' to "credit window 
> >>>>>>>>>> initialization" (quotation marks removed; they're here only to 
> >>>>>>>>>> show what was updated).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This update is reflected in the latest files, which are posted 
> >>>>>>>>>> here.  Please refresh your browser:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383355832%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Txo2jWwVS73Ls1VRMwc%2BFoQipgMLFrZkbSWXpSWx798%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383368915%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rH2zZx7XodkULDnIKsvGaQOsub1Q1hhW7mzfd4OpTJ4%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383381593%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kE5H7d7kU5InDkCLpqiUSCxm9z%2BwKXv%2Bbf978JT5ERw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383394010%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=xNFCPPjQHtHlJVtMPQdmm806W628MzpeudyKBWq1ing%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383410450%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=IZk%2FDL%2BbrETwQGIzWXfnqC8fFrdfs5zoVLcvPJccqb8%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383430251%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2F2cTwhTHTcgvzil6rgPhpzCnpla5Vz7FpFrKpVE80rw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383448883%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=l6HzDBaHC4rlAD96UuFAnYxCzX3Lc03Ph9GP9ogCk9c%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383468669%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PSOOkxO2deZaTNMolv7HmY3YbslJnCC1udIFAw8qTqE%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383488289%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4XAGJIHPKu8OAMU0lFX6rvqK5F2Dj2AiXDkUMd79vBk%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-lastrfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383507236%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FQpjPPO6lhEIbQSbv2TUUweGrksVab616woCHnV5W80%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-xmldiff1.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383525273%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iWXshlbqsnfosEdHEu3RAt37ZjjOmO6lnovxHGlhPW8%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-xmldiff2.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383543330%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=6o2Xe7dtc%2Bi71A0fZIqoBN5Nq57szLL9Xf7DM9Zfcio%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383561056%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Z2QlYX1ChK13t40ozq%2BVxbYWM4Do17c0pg3XeuU98Bc%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks again!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew
> >>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2025, at 3:58 PM, Eric Kinzie <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue Dec 02 13:21:58 -0800 2025, Lynne Bartholomew wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Eric.  Thank you for the email.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> We have updated this document per your notes below.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> A couple follow-up items for you:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Please review our update regarding our question 8); it appears 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> that you approved our "Perhaps" text.  We kept both citations 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> for RFC 8175 to avoid possible confusion between "Status Data 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Item" and "Credit Window Status Data Item".  Please let us know 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> whether or not our update is correct here (and if you object to 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the second citation for RFC 8175).
> >>>>>>>>>>> I approved the "Perhaps" text.  Your update is correct.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * May we change '"Credit Window Initialization"' to '"credit 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> window initialization"' in this sentence (appears to be used 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> generally and applies to this document only)?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Modems provide an initial credit window size at the time of 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Credit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Window Initialization".
> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, changing that to lowercase letters makes sense.  I also 
> >>>>>>>>>>> think the
> >>>>>>>>>>> quotation marks can be removed, but I'll leave that to your 
> >>>>>>>>>>> judgement.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Eric
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> = = = = =
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The latest files are posted here.  Please refresh your browser:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383585259%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3KDsk19qwhwhyzJZy%2BpFlhGLWFP95A31UcZLS9SQDSw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383602261%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Bdxhs%2BjK0AIJSGTLhFggMZiTXmtmIVjy1Q2Km3ayivc%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383618375%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yW5O0qG8%2BabBx1VJ%2Fmtc3OEfEly84kscTsWimi85uns%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383632676%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cb02ychKnrAemRyPZCq1JQHnXmu3%2F8cjbCScJMc0jZo%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383645974%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=AHBXyvCdkZFmlrELUthOkr79HfhmW0ufG%2Fae0iYwWkU%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383659108%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nWVzyANZc9744fi%2Frz0LOHiW9g49gbbkn%2FZVp3IduK8%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383673534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=77m7AnuiPA%2FFUAXop3dflOh9dBgB9vYYJUX9vgzUeHM%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383688278%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0q5gJGhqo783JGVfzPzcoxdIAYtF%2FtxTSjj34nspa%2Fg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454383704630%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nu4b8NBg8fH2JEr31lAp78kBnf0ZKID10zBf0bWvOQ0%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-lastrfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384063123%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=c0ewgDFLTTHmUEF5PjD6LId4aUbk3e3qu7vUgYDikFo%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>  (side by side)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-xmldiff1.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384077560%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=pbBg%2BN%2FysMZs7ma8RWmQGgGOEwTle3SqYwYIR3jdKPk%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-xmldiff2.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384090975%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zdNWIrO1Q4Pp9b%2BerOpzDXqVJzLm%2Fgb6dqjVAiZ1PL0%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9893-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384103858%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=03RZx0Q8uQwluDgA8eNy1tJLmH5z%2FzKkLKL5pJe6%2FoI%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks again!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew
> >>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2025, at 8:38 AM, Eric Kinzie <[email protected]> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lynne, please see my responses below.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Eric
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon Dec 01 08:33:00 -0800 2025, Lynne Bartholomew wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Authors,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (as necessar=
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> y) the following questions, which are also in the source file.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) <!-- [rfced] Please insert any keywords (beyond those that 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear in =
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> title) for use on 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fsearch&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384116575%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Vm4Y41Jrdq6isLTGTzEWoh1GL7wAcQ%2BcOXfgZ9AzJrA%3D&reserved=0>.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) <!-- [rfced] Abstract:  As it appears that the two new 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message types
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Credit Control and Credit Control Response) also figure 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prominently
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this document (and appear to be mentioned in the document 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> title),
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would you like to also mention them in the Abstract?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This document defines new Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (DLEP) Data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Items that are used to support credit-based flow control.  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> window control is used to regulate when data may be sent to an
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> associated virtual or physical queue.  The Data Items are 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extensible
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and reusable.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Possibly:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This document defines new Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (DLEP) Data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Items that are used to support credit-based flow control.  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> window control is used to regulate when data may be sent to an
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> associated virtual or physical queue.  These Data Items are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extensible and reusable.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This document also defines new messages that support credit 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> window
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That change is fine.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) <!-- [rfced] FYI:  We have added expansions for 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abbreviations where
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they are first used, per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guide")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Finfo%2Frfc7322&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384128967%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=AMLMXhvU%2FGRCs6WVHQnp71fSMmkmR6rsxpneB1Gfz14%3D&reserved=0).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Please review the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following expansions to ensure correctness.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DSCP: Differentiated Services Code Point (Figure 1)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MAC: Media Access Control (Section 2)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PCP: Priority Code Point (Figure 1) -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) <!-- [rfced] Section 1:  We updated "control plane pause 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanism" per RFC 8651.  Please let us know any objections.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, a credit-window
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scheme for destination-specific flow control which provides 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aggregate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flow control for both modem and routers has been proposed in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [I-D.ietf-manet-credit-window], and a control plane pause 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanism is defined in [RFC8651].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, a credit-window
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scheme for destination-specific flow control that provides 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aggregate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flow control for both modems and routers has been proposed in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Credit-Window-Extension], and a mechanism referred to as the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Control-Plane-Based Pause Extension is defined in [RFC8651]. 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5) <!-- [rfced] Section 2:  We had trouble determining what 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is listed in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this sentence.  We updated as follows.  If this is incorrect, 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clarify the text.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This means that the use of FIDs, TIDs and the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> association of a TID to a DLEP destination enables a modem to 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> share
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or dedicate resources as needed to match the specifics of its
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation and its attached transmission technology.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This means that the use
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of FIDs and TIDs, and the association of a TID to a DLEP 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destination,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enable a modem to share or dedicate resources as needed to 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> match the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specifics of its implementation and its attached transmission
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technology. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.1:  We had trouble following this 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sentence.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does "framing" mean "frame size" or something else?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the example of Ethernet, framing,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> header and trailer are all included in this count. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "framing" is used here as it is used in the Ethernet standard.  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer to leave this unchanged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.2.1:  We had trouble parsing these 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sentences.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the suggested text is not correct, please clarify "having 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> traffic available to send, but no credits available".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modems will need to balance the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> load generated by sending and processing credit window 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increases
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against a router having data traffic available to send, but no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> credits available.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Routers will need to balance the load
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated by sending and processing credit window requests 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having data traffic available to send, but no credits 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suggested:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modems will need to balance the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> load generated by sending and processing credit window 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increases
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against a router that has data traffic available to send but 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available credits.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Routers will need to balance the load
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated by sending and processing credit window requests 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having data traffic available to send but no available 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> credits. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.3:  Does "a Status Data Item" refer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specifically to the Status Data Item defined in RFC 8175 - in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case RFC 8175 should be cited here - or does it refer to the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Window Status Data Item as defined in this document?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In particular, the node parsing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Data Item MUST terminate the session with a Status Data 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Item
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indicating Invalid Data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In particular, the node parsing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Data Item MUST terminate the session with a Status Data 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Item
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [RFC8175] indicating "Invalid Data".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It refers to the Status Data Item defined in RFC 8175.  This 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wording
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is fine.  I think it is also ok to remove "; see [RFC8175]" 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> from the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> previous sentence if this seems repetitive.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or possibly:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In particular, the node parsing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Data Item MUST terminate the session with a Credit Window 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Status
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data Item indicating "Invalid Data" as defined in [RFC8175]. 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.3.1:  As the dashes initially 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared to be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minus signs, we changed them to colons.  If this is 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorrect, please
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consider whether these entries could be written in some other 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We also gave the table a title.  Please let us know any 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objections.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you prefer a different title, please specify.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original (dashes are broken in order to avoid xml2rfc's 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Double
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hyphen within comment" error):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Value  Scale
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - - - - -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0   B - Bytes     (Octets)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1  KB - Kilobytes (B/1024)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2  MB - Megabytes (KB/1024)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3  GB - Gigabytes (MB/1024)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Value |          Scale          |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | 0     | B: Bytes (Octets)       |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +- - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - -+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | 1     | KB: Kilobytes (B/1024)  |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +- - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - -+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | 2     | MB: Megabytes (KB/1024) |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +- - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - -+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | 3     | GB: Gigabytes (MB/1024) |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +- - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - -+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Table 1: Valid Scale Field Values -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That table looks good.  No objection.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.3.1:  Does "Credit Value" 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specifically refer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the Credit Value field, or does it mean "credit value" as 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally elsewhere in this document (e.g., "appropriate 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> credit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values" as written in Section 2)?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the resulting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Value results in the credit window exceeding the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> represented
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Window Max Size, the Credit Window Max Size field 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used as the new credit window size. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It means "credit value" as used generally elsewhere and should 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> New:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If the resulting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> credit value results in the credit window exceeding the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> represented
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Window Max Size, the Credit Window Max Size field value 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> used as the new credit window size.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.3.2:  Because this sentence as 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indicated that the data plane state is updated as needed, we 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "are" to "is" accordingly (also per "In both cases, a router 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MUST
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also ensure that any data plane state, e.g.,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control], that is associated 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the TID is updated as needed." in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification, where it cites 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document).  If this is incorrect, please clarify what is being
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated as needed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the traffic classification information is located, the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router MUST ensure that any data plane state that is 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> associated with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the TID and its corresponding FIDs are updated as needed (per
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Section 2.1).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the traffic classification information is located, the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router MUST ensure that any data plane state that is 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> associated with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the TID and its corresponding FIDs is updated as needed (per
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Section 2.1). -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.3.3:  Does "a Credit Window Status 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data Item
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or items" mean "one or more Credit Window Status Data Items" 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does "or items" refer to some other types of items other than 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Items?  We ask because we see "Credit Window Status Data 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Item(s)" in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the next sentence.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original (the next sentence is included for context):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When a Credit Window Grant Data Item is received in other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message types, the receiving router MUST send a Credit Window 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Status
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data Item or items reflecting the resulting Credit Window 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the updated credit window.  When the Credit Grant Data Item is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received in a Destination Up Message, the Credit Window 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Status Data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Item(s) MUST be sent in the corresponding Destination Up 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Response
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Message.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When a Credit Window Grant Data Item is received in other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message types, the receiving router MUST send one or more 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Window Status Data Items reflecting the resultant Credit 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Window
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value of the updated credit window. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This means "one or more Credit Window Status Data Items".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> New:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For each Credit Window Grant Data Item received in other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> message types, the receiving router MUST send a Credit Window 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Status
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Data Item reflecting the resulting Credit Window value of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the updated credit windows.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.3.5:  Should "credit request" be 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "credit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> window request" as used generally elsewhere in the text?  We 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see "credit request" used anywhere else in this document or 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documents (Cluster 541 /
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fcluster_info.php%3Fcid%3D3DC541&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384142032%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=RZ6%2FnuaRjhKeIdqq1WqNrb5X6gdzq5lwTv3ogfACQP8%3D&reserved=0).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A special FID value, as defined below, is used to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate that a credit request is being made across all 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queues. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it should be "credit window request".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> New:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A special FID value, as defined below, is used to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate that a credit window request is being made across all 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> queues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.3.5:  We do not see a Type field 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in RFC 8175,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but we see a "Data Item Type" field.  May we update as 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (per Section 11.3 ("DLEP Generic Data Item") of RFC 8175), to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distinguish this definition from the definitions of Length in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sections 11.1 ("DLEP Signal Header") and 11.2 ("DLEP Message 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Header")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of RFC 8175, which do not mention excluding a "Type" field?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As specified in [RFC8175], Length is the number of octets in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data Item, excluding the Type and Length fields.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suggested:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As specified in [RFC8175], Length is the number of octets in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data Item, excluding the Data Item Type and Length fields. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 15) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.3.5:  We changed "Credit 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Increment" to "credi=
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> window increment" here, as we could not find the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initial-capitalized
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> form elsewhere in this document, in the group (cluster) of 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documents, or in any published RFC to date.  This update is 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line with this sentence from Section 2.2.1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A modem receiving this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message MUST respond with a Credit Control Response Message 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the received message and Data Item and the processing defined 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Section 2.2.2, which will typically result in credit window
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increments being provided.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know any objections.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A modem receiving this Data Item MUST provide a Credit 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Increment for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the indicated credit windows via Credit Window Grant Data 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Items
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> carried in a new Credit Control Message.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A modem receiving this Data Item MUST provide a credit window
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increment for the indicated credit windows via Credit Window 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data Items carried in a new Credit Control Message. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16) <!-- [rfced] Section 2.4:  We changed "the mismatch of 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capabilities"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to "any mismatch in capabilities" per
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension.  Please let us 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know any
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objections.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either case, the mismatch of capabilities SHOULD be reported 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user via normal network management mechanisms, such as the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interface or error logging.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either case, any mismatch in capabilities SHOULD be reported 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user via normal network management mechanisms, such as the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interface or error logging. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17) <!-- [rfced] Section 4:  We had trouble following "some 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> references to external documents listed below" in this 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paragraph.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that "external documents" is intended to refer to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [BCP195], [IEEE-802.1AE], and [IEEE-8802-1X].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, we see that [RFC8175] cites [IEEE-802.1X] ("IEEE 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standards
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Local and metropolitan area networks-Port-Based Network 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Access
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Control"), but this document cites [IEEE-8802-1X] 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("IEEE/ISO/IEC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International Standard-Telecommunications and exchange between
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information technology systems-Requirements for local and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metropolitan area networks-Part 1X:Port-based network access
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control").
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> May we update as suggested?  If not, please clarify the text.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The transport layer security mechanisms documented in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [RFC8175], with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some updated references to external documents listed below, 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied to this document.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suggested:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The transport layer security mechanisms documented in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [RFC8175],
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> along with the latest versions of [BCP195], [IEEE-802.1AE], 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [IEEE-8802-1X] at the time of this writing, can be applied to 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The IEEE documents should not be referenced in this sentence.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> New:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The transport layer security mechanisms documented in [RFC8175],
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> along with the latest version of [BCP195] at the time of this 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> writing,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can be applied to this document.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18) <!-- [rfced] [IEEE-802.1AE]:  The title listed here does 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not match
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the title found at the provided URL.  Is the intent here to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specifically point to Amendment 4 (in which case the citation 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> string
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be changed to [IEEE-802.1AEdk-2023] and the URL should 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed to 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fdocument%2F10225636&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384154968%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Y3Q%2BpOI87QFbxJakSnCt4GhGdvFhTRRkK1%2F1WA8Zk3E%3D&reserved=0>),
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  or would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you prefer to list [IEEE-802.1AE] per
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification-17?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [IEEE-802.1AE]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Media Access Control (MAC) Security Amendment 4: MAC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Privacy protection",
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fdocument%2F8585421&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384168407%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PtXsmFv9GjtLYGGUQ6xDI8lhGxyI7r4cPCgKOYbvZAE%3D&reserved=0>.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As listed in the edited copy of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification-17:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [IEEE-802.1AE]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  networks-Media Access Control (MAC) Security",
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2018.8585421, IEEE Std 802.1AE-2018,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  December 2018,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fdocument%2F8585421&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384181615%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=P%2FiIDPS%2B2QKZpq9qBEWFe4bK%2BfxILX5EoIXNBXov2nE%3D&reserved=0>.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it's necessary to specify amendment 4.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> New:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [IEEE-802.1AE]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>  IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>  networks-Media Access Control (MAC) Security",
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>  DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2018.8585421, IEEE Std 802.1AE-2018,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>  December 2018,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fdocument%2F8585421&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384194699%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fMk%2BwABZZcGwTDE6AFu6Boivd5NcIOw1O7VJZLshBLI%3D&reserved=0>.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>  -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19) <!-- [rfced] Appendix B:  We changed "traffic 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> classification data sub
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> items" to "Traffic Classification Sub-Data Items" per
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification and the rest of 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group (Cluster 541 /
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fcluster_info.php%3Fcid%3D3DC541&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384212226%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ofKT4CMsrsKWS507cvLWOC9fMYPVEYaVkDMu4g512fs%3D&reserved=0)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  of documents.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know any objections.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification] defines the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> traffic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> classification data sub items such as DiffServ code points 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that map
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the FIDs.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [RFC9892] defines the Traffic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classification Sub-Data Items, such as DSCPs, that map to the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FIDs. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> portion of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online Style Guide at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fstyleguide%2Fpart2%2F%23inclusive_language&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384227649%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZDFSc5tO1IVawc4iffH2LBbFqm2GP2XN9mOt6NHuSVg%3D&reserved=0>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and let us know if any changes are needed.  Updates of this 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nature
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typically result in more precise language, which is helpful 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should still be reviewed as a best practice. -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reviewed.  I haven't found anything that does not comply with 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the NIST
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> guidance.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21) <!-- [rfced] Please let us know if any changes are needed 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a) The following terms were used inconsistently in this 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We chose to use the latter forms.  Please let us know any 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objections.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Additional Credit (field name, i.e., "Additional Credit:") /
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Additional Credits ("Additional Credits field")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> credit based flow control / credit-based flow control (added 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hyphen)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit-Based Flow Control (in text) / credit-based flow 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Control message (2 instances) / Credit Control Message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Control Response message (1 instance) /
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Control Response Message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Window size (1 instance, i.e., "a Credit Window size") 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> credit window size (7 instances, e.g., "an initial credit 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> window
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> size") (used generally throughout Section 2)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data item / Data Item (per the rest of this document and per 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group (cluster) of documents)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different Credit windows / different credit windows
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Messages / messages ("common Messages", "No messages")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (We changed "common Messages" to "common messages".)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Window Association Data Item (2 instances in Appendix B) /
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Window Association Data Item (10 instances in text,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the table entry in the IANA Considerations section, and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fdlep-parameters%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384243427%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KkI1hHhBjIJolJmwGg9jUOj1UqYQj7q4TcjycY3lETE%3D&reserved=0>)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b) The following term appears to be used inconsistently in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document.  Please let us know which form is preferred.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Window / credit window (used generally, e.g., 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "associated
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Window", "associated credit window",
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'logical "Credit Window(s)s"')
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Note:  We also see 'logical "Credit Windows"' in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension.  Otherwise, all of 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documents in this group of documents use the lowercase form
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "credit window" when used generally.)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's use lowercase "credit window" when used generally.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c) Please let us know how/if the following should be made 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Grant Data Item (3 instances in text) /
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Window Grant Data Item (~13 instances in text) /
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grant Data Item (2 instances in text) ("each Grant Data Item",
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "or Grant Data Item")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suggested, assuming that these different forms all refer to 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same type of Data Item:  Credit Window Grant Data Item, per
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fdlep-parameters%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cc9b167c733c4479a4d1608de5d00966d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639050454384261569%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=c%2BLolKPU0Wb0UfWG8f8%2BugdC0Jpz6zYmTcU8mdNXsqQ%3D&reserved=0>.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alternatively, please let us know if the IANA entry needs to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be changed (e.g., from "Credit Window Grant" to "Credit Grant"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or simply "Grant", noting that any such change would not match
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the format of the other entries on the page.) -->
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> These can all be changed to "Credit Window Grant Data Item".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to