> [rfced] Apologies if our question was unclear. Our main issue with > the text is that "sub-prefixes entries” seems problematic with them > both being plural
agree. sub-prefix entries > and wanted to confirm this was not a possessive relationship nope > However, Randy’s comment seems to imply that even the original text > might not need the text after the comma. redundancy elimination randy -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
