On Fri, 15 May 2026, Megan Ferguson wrote:
> Hi Damien,
>
> Thank you for your prompt reply and updated file. We have adopted the XML
> with only the slight change of sorting the references.
Thanks!
> Regarding sourcecode types:
>
> >> Either blank or, if it is possible to define a new sourcecode type,
> >> then "ssh-message" might be a useful addition - I'd certainly use
> >> it in other drafts I have pending.
>
> We went ahead and sent a request to the mailing list ([email protected].)
> mentioned at
> https://rpc-wiki.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=sourcecode-types for a
> new “ssh-message” type. For this document, would you like to leave them
> blank or wait for a new “ssh-message" to be available (these wheels usually
> turn in just a few days)?
I'm happy to wait a couple more days, but if there's no reply say by the end of
the week then I think it would be fine to go ahead with a blank sourcecode type.
> As you otherwise indicated your approval of the document in this form, we
> have updated your status to “Approved” at the AUTH48 status page (see link
> below). Once we hear back on the sourcecode type question, we will be ready
> to move this document forward in the publication process.
Excellent, thanks!
> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.pdf
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.xml
These look good to me.
Kind regards,
Damien
--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
