Hi Megan, All looks good - I approve.
Thanks, Damien On Mon, 18 May 2026, Megan Ferguson wrote: > Hi Damien, > > After further review and discussion, we have decided not to use <sourcecode > type=“ssh-message”>; the type will instead be left blank. > > Note that we have also converted the items marked as <sourcecode> in Section > 8 into tables. > > Please confirm this version works for you, and we can move forward in the > publication process. > > The files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.xml > > The files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-diff.html (comprehensive) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 only) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-lastdiff.html (last version to > this) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) > > The AUTH48 status page is viewable here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9987 > > Thank you. > > Megan Ferguson > RFC Production Center > > > > On May 17, 2026, at 5:23 PM, Damien Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 15 May 2026, Megan Ferguson wrote: > > > >> Hi Damien, > >> > >> Thank you for your prompt reply and updated file. We have adopted the XML > >> with only the slight change of sorting the references. > > > > Thanks! > > > >> Regarding sourcecode types: > >> > >>>> Either blank or, if it is possible to define a new sourcecode type, > >>>> then "ssh-message" might be a useful addition - I'd certainly use > >>>> it in other drafts I have pending. > >> > >> We went ahead and sent a request to the mailing list ([email protected].) > >> mentioned at > >> https://rpc-wiki.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=sourcecode-types for > >> a new “ssh-message” type. For this document, would you like to leave them > >> blank or wait for a new “ssh-message" to be available (these wheels > >> usually turn in just a few days)? > > > > I'm happy to wait a couple more days, but if there's no reply say by the > > end of the week then I think it would be fine to go ahead with a blank > > sourcecode type. > > > >> As you otherwise indicated your approval of the document in this form, we > >> have updated your status to “Approved” at the AUTH48 status page (see link > >> below). Once we hear back on the sourcecode type question, we will be > >> ready to move this document forward in the publication process. > > > > Excellent, thanks! > > > >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.pdf > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.html > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.xml > > > > These look good to me. > > > > Kind regards, > > Damien > > >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
