Hi Damien, After further review and discussion, we have decided not to use <sourcecode type=“ssh-message”>; the type will instead be left blank.
Note that we have also converted the items marked as <sourcecode> in Section 8 into tables. Please confirm this version works for you, and we can move forward in the publication process. The files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.xml The files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-diff.html (comprehensive) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-rfcdiff.html (side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 only) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-lastdiff.html (last version to this) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) The AUTH48 status page is viewable here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9987 Thank you. Megan Ferguson RFC Production Center > On May 17, 2026, at 5:23 PM, Damien Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 15 May 2026, Megan Ferguson wrote: > >> Hi Damien, >> >> Thank you for your prompt reply and updated file. We have adopted the XML >> with only the slight change of sorting the references. > > Thanks! > >> Regarding sourcecode types: >> >>>> Either blank or, if it is possible to define a new sourcecode type, >>>> then "ssh-message" might be a useful addition - I'd certainly use >>>> it in other drafts I have pending. >> >> We went ahead and sent a request to the mailing list ([email protected].) >> mentioned at >> https://rpc-wiki.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=sourcecode-types for a >> new “ssh-message” type. For this document, would you like to leave them >> blank or wait for a new “ssh-message" to be available (these wheels usually >> turn in just a few days)? > > I'm happy to wait a couple more days, but if there's no reply say by the end > of the week then I think it would be fine to go ahead with a blank sourcecode > type. > >> As you otherwise indicated your approval of the document in this form, we >> have updated your status to “Approved” at the AUTH48 status page (see link >> below). Once we hear back on the sourcecode type question, we will be ready >> to move this document forward in the publication process. > > Excellent, thanks! > >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.xml > > These look good to me. > > Kind regards, > Damien -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
