Hi Britta, We’re reaching out to you at this email address, per Datatracker, as your nps.edu <http://nps.edu/> address doesn’t seem to be working.
Please review and approve of the updated files below. Once we receive your approval, we will move this document forward in the publication process. The files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.pdf The relevant diff files have been posted here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-auth48diff.html (Final Review changes) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-auth48rfcdiff.html (Final Review changes side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-lastdiff.html (last version to this one) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this) For the Final Review status of this document, please see: https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9955/ Thank you, Alanna Paloma RFC Production Center > On Jun 30, 2026, at 2:46 PM, Alanna Paloma <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Paul > > Thank you for sending over the snapshot. Unfortunately, we cannot confirm > Britta's approval yet, as it doesn't show who is conversing. Any chance you > can ask her to send us her approval directly? Otherwise, we may ask Chris to > approve in her absence. > > Is <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a working address? > Alternatively, would <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> (per Datatracker) be better? > > Best regards, > Alanna Paloma > RFC Production Center > >> On Jun 29, 2026, at 5:31 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Jun 29, 2026, at 17:10, Alanna Paloma <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Additionally, as much as possible, we’d like to have an indication of >>> Britta’s approval in our archives; any chance you can send us a snapshot of >>> her approval? If this is problematic, perhaps Chris could give approval on >>> her behalf. We would prefer to avoid exception cases to the approval >>> process when possible. >> >> I love the idea of snapshots as proof! See attached. >> >> --Paul Hoffman >> <britta-approval.png> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
