Greetings, Thank you for reaching out. I approve of the changes.
Please continue to keep the "@nps.edu" email as the one listed on the RFC. Cheers, Britta > -----Original Message----- > From: Alanna Paloma <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2026 3:40 PM > To: Hale, Britta J HQE (USA) <[email protected]> > Cc: Paul Hoffman <[email protected]>; Hale, Britta (CIV) > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Flo D > <[email protected]>; Nina Bindel <[email protected]>; pquip- > [email protected]; [email protected]; Paul Wouters <[email protected]>; > auth48archive <[email protected]>; RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc- > editor.org>; Deirdre Connolly <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Ext] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9955 <draft-ietf-pquip-hybrid- > signature-spectrums-07> for your review > > [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this > is > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > Hi Britta, > > We’re reaching out to you at this email address, per Datatracker, as your > nps.edu <http://nps.edu/> address doesn’t seem to be working. > > Please review and approve of the updated files below. Once we receive your > approval, we will move this document forward in the publication process. > > The files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.xml > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.pdf > > The relevant diff files have been posted here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-diff.html (comprehensive diff) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-auth48diff.html (Final Review > changes) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-auth48rfcdiff.html (Final > Review changes side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955- > lastdiff.html (last version to this one) https://www.rfc- > editor.org/authors/rfc9955-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and > this) > > For the Final Review status of this document, please see: > https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9955/ > > Thank you, > Alanna Paloma > RFC Production Center > > > On Jun 30, 2026, at 2:46 PM, Alanna Paloma <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Paul > > > > Thank you for sending over the snapshot. Unfortunately, we cannot confirm > Britta's approval yet, as it doesn't show who is conversing. Any chance you > can > ask her to send us her approval directly? Otherwise, we may ask Chris to > approve in her absence. > > > > Is <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a working address? > Alternatively, would <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> (per Datatracker) be better? > > > > Best regards, > > Alanna Paloma > > RFC Production Center > > > >> On Jun 29, 2026, at 5:31 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Jun 29, 2026, at 17:10, Alanna Paloma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Additionally, as much as possible, we’d like to have an indication of > >>> Britta’s > approval in our archives; any chance you can send us a snapshot of her > approval? If this is problematic, perhaps Chris could give approval on her > behalf. We would prefer to avoid exception cases to the approval process > when possible. > >> > >> I love the idea of snapshots as proof! See attached. > >> > >> --Paul Hoffman > >> <britta-approval.png> > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
