Hi Britta, Thank you for sending you approval. It’s been noted here: https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9955/
We will leave your email address as is within the document. Best regards, Alanna Paloma RFC Production Center > On Jun 30, 2026, at 3:57 PM, Hale, Britta J HQE (USA) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greetings, > > Thank you for reaching out. I approve of the changes. > > Please continue to keep the "@nps.edu" email as the one listed on the RFC. > > Cheers, > > Britta > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alanna Paloma <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2026 3:40 PM >> To: Hale, Britta J HQE (USA) <[email protected]> >> Cc: Paul Hoffman <[email protected]>; Hale, Britta (CIV) >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Flo D >> <[email protected]>; Nina Bindel <[email protected]>; pquip- >> [email protected]; [email protected]; Paul Wouters <[email protected]>; >> auth48archive <[email protected]>; RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc- >> editor.org>; Deirdre Connolly <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Ext] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9955 <draft-ietf-pquip-hybrid- >> signature-spectrums-07> for your review >> >> [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this >> is >> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] >> >> Hi Britta, >> >> We’re reaching out to you at this email address, per Datatracker, as your >> nps.edu <http://nps.edu/> address doesn’t seem to be working. >> >> Please review and approve of the updated files below. Once we receive your >> approval, we will move this document forward in the publication process. >> >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.pdf >> >> The relevant diff files have been posted here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-diff.html (comprehensive diff) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-auth48diff.html (Final Review >> changes) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-auth48rfcdiff.html (Final >> Review changes side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955- >> lastdiff.html (last version to this one) https://www.rfc- >> editor.org/authors/rfc9955-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and >> this) >> >> For the Final Review status of this document, please see: >> https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9955/ >> >> Thank you, >> Alanna Paloma >> RFC Production Center >> >>> On Jun 30, 2026, at 2:46 PM, Alanna Paloma <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Paul >>> >>> Thank you for sending over the snapshot. Unfortunately, we cannot confirm >> Britta's approval yet, as it doesn't show who is conversing. Any chance you >> can >> ask her to send us her approval directly? Otherwise, we may ask Chris to >> approve in her absence. >>> >>> Is <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a working address? >> Alternatively, would <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> (per Datatracker) be better? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Alanna Paloma >>> RFC Production Center >>> >>>> On Jun 29, 2026, at 5:31 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jun 29, 2026, at 17:10, Alanna Paloma <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Additionally, as much as possible, we’d like to have an indication of >>>>> Britta’s >> approval in our archives; any chance you can send us a snapshot of her >> approval? If this is problematic, perhaps Chris could give approval on her >> behalf. We would prefer to avoid exception cases to the approval process >> when possible. >>>> >>>> I love the idea of snapshots as proof! See attached. >>>> >>>> --Paul Hoffman >>>> <britta-approval.png> >>> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
