Hi Daniel, It was our pleasure!
Reading your message, it is unclear whether you are requesting an update to the IANA registry (only) or the registry and the RFC. Looking at the registry now, we see that it was updated to refer to RFC 9880 and links to Section 6.1 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9980#section-6.1. We recommend not making changes as this time if the section references are correct, as the goal is for the registry and RFC to match where possible. Note that updates to the RFC can only be made via verified errata. Thank you. Megan Ferguson RFC Production Center > On Jul 2, 2026, at 2:17 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thank you all for the close reads, editorial improvements, and updates. > > I'm very pleased to see the release of RFC 9980! > > I note that > https://www.iana.org/assignments/openpgp/openpgp.xhtml#openpgp-public-key-algorithms > still refers to https://www.iana.org/go/draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc-16 when i > think it should instead point toward RFC 9980. > > I'd recommend update the section numbers for the SLH-DSA algorithms as > well; i think they should point to section 6, not section 6.1. This > aligns them with the composite ML-DSA algorithms (which point to section > 5), and the composite ML-KEM algorithms (which point to sction 4). > > It's possible that this IANA table update is just a syncing process > already underway, in which case please feel free to disregard. If not, > let us know if you need anything else from the chairs, authors, ADs or > RFC editors. > > Regards, > > --dkg -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
