Hi Daniel, IANA will update references to point to the RFC within one week of when we receive notification of RFC publication (this one that was just replied). They've been updated to RFC 9980 (as of Friday last week).
With regard to pointing to section 6 instead of section 6.1, could you file an errata against the RFC? We currently have the references as they are listed in the IANA Considerations section. We'll update the reference once we've received notification that the errata has been verified (please notify us as well if you can to make it easier). Thank you! Best regards, David Dong IANA Services Sr. Specialist On Thu Jul 02 20:18:13 2026, [email protected] wrote: > Thank you all for the close reads, editorial improvements, and > updates. > > I'm very pleased to see the release of RFC 9980! > > I note that > https://www.iana.org/assignments/openpgp/openpgp.xhtml#openpgp-public- > key-algorithms > still refers to https://www.iana.org/go/draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc-16 when > i > think it should instead point toward RFC 9980. > > I'd recommend update the section numbers for the SLH-DSA algorithms as > well; i think they should point to section 6, not section 6.1. This > aligns them with the composite ML-DSA algorithms (which point to > section > 5), and the composite ML-KEM algorithms (which point to sction 4). > > It's possible that this IANA table update is just a syncing process > already underway, in which case please feel free to disregard. If > not, > let us know if you need anything else from the chairs, authors, ADs or > RFC editors. > > Regards, > > --dkg -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
