Ralph Aichinger wrote:

> > So, people, please speak up! In particular, does anyone object to the CC 
> > license, and if so why?
> 
> I haven't read all of this discussion yet, but I do think with some
> CC licenses there is a huge problem: They are considered non-free
> by the Debian project, because they are not compatible with the
> Debian Free Software Guidelines. 

First of all, these aren't software licenses. Second, we are talking about 
a very specific CC license. Not just any license. We are talking about the 
CC Attribution. And *that* license is a free (non-software) license:

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html

Scroll to the bottom. It says that the CC Attribution is "a non-copyleft 
Free license". The CC attribution license is the most free license 
available from Creative Commons.

Finally, this license is *more* free than the PDL. I can't imagine anyone 
considering the PDL free and the CC-Attribution non-free.

Do you have the email address for debian-legal ?

Cheers,
-- 
Daniel Carrera          | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today!  | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org   | 

Reply via email to