On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 17:43 -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote: > First of all, these aren't software licenses.
Yes, of course. But distributing the ooauthors guides on Debian CDs would make sense nevertheless, software or "just" documentation. > Second, we are talking about > a very specific CC license. Not just any license. We are talking about the > CC Attribution. And *that* license is a free (non-software) license: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html > > Scroll to the bottom. It says that the CC Attribution is "a non-copyleft > Free license". The CC attribution license is the most free license > available from Creative Commons. > > Finally, this license is *more* free than the PDL. I can't imagine anyone > considering the PDL free and the CC-Attribution non-free. Debian agrees with the FSF very often, but not always. The Gnu Free Document License is one example. This is the same as described in http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/dls-006-ccby or isn't it? I am no expert in these things, and maybe I *am* mixing something up. > Do you have the email address for debian-legal ? It's [email protected] and posts by non-subscribers are generally accepted on public Debian lists AFAIK. Sorry to bring this up that late, but I did not read it earlier. /ralph -- Rettet die Wale und stÃrzt das System, und trennt euren MÃll, denn viel Mist ist nicht schÃn! Gustav, "Rettet die Wale"
