What about the guide for the Math Component?...it should be relatively short and sweet (at least not several chapters long like the others)...we haven't discussed this document yet? (or did I miss something?)
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 22:10 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > Peter Kupfer wrote: > >Hello, I am bored. > > > >What should I do. > > > >I am either going to write another Calc chapter, > >probably Working with Multiple Worksheets, or I > >could keep reviewing documents. > > > >Will someone who has a better feel for our priorities > >please let me know. For the time being I am going to > >review working with styles in writer. Hopefully by the > >time I am done I will get feedback. > > Peter, reviewing "Working with Styles" was going to be my first suggestion, so > I'm glad you're doing that one. > > Here are my other suggestions, in order of priority: > > 1) Write another Calc chapter. > > 2) As Daniel suggested, you might look at the Data Sources chapter. In additon > to reviewing the content, it needs reformatting to be consistent with our > styles. If you could do that reformatting, that would be very helpful. For > example, Dan used a lot of bold type where our style doesn't use bold; somehow > a lot of the headings have ended up in the wrong font even though they are > tagged with the correct style (I've seen that in other chapters; I don't know > what causes it); and the numbered lists aren't in our style. > > 3) If you haven't already reviewed "Working with Writer" and would like to do > some rewriting, that chapter can use all the help it can get. It is a mess at > the moment. It's not really up for a review as much as a rewrite because I put > together a bunch of material from several sources but did not have time to > make > the result coherent. For example, there is a lot of duplication of information > and I think a lot of info that is too basic to be in there (explanations of > what copy, cut, and paste are, for example). A thorough "machete edit" is what > it needs: cut out all the extraneous stuff and make the rest readable. Does > that sound like a good challenge for you? :-) > > Regards, Jean > -- Regards, Rick Barnes www.nostabo.net ******************************************************************* PRIVILEGED - PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL This electronic mail is solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you receive this electronic mail in error, please delete it from your system immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or using any of the contact details noted herein. This e-mail sent via Evolution 2.0.4 running on a Linux 2.6.11 kernel.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
