Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> I've also changed the name of the chapter to "Getting Started with Base" so
> it matches the chapter titles for Writer, Calc, etc that are being
> including in the book. I'm wondering if it would be better as "Getting
> Started with Databases" -- any thoughts on that?
The advantage of '... with Base' is it names the product and provides
symmetry with the other chapters. The advantage of '... with Database' is
it'll be more meaningful.
One idea (I'm just brainstorming, this isn't a suggestion):
Change all titles to:
Getting Started with <Component>:
OpenOffice.org's <Clear description>
For example:
* Getting Startd with Writer:
OpenOffice.org's word processor
* Getting Startd with Calc:
OpenOffice.org's spreadsheet
* Getting Startd with Impress:
OpenOffice.org's presentations
* Getting Startd with Draw:
OpenOffice.org's vector graphics
* Getting Startd with Base:
OpenOffice.org's database
I'll need to think about this some more. These titles seem rather verbose
to me. Maybe there is an alternative I haven't thought of. But in any
event, I thought I'd mention this.
Cheers,
--
Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org |
