T. J. Frazier wrote:
T. J. Frazier wrote:

One small point I found in the OOOComputerCode style. It specifies "pair kerning", which is probably harmless for a mono-spaced font, but it shouldn't be there. IMHO, not worth a re-issue, just "next time . . .".

I have uploaded to "Contrib resources > Feedback" a document created from the 0306 template, with change bars and notes. The only serious problem is that the numbering styles don't seem to be working, at the end of a nested series of lists (i.e., they show wrong numbers). The styles applied in the example are not what I would expect, either. I tried applying the "End" styles, instead of the "Cont" styles. That changed the numbers, but not correctly.

I thought you could work with this format (an odt file created from the template) fairly easily, since you can edit the template itself in a separate window, and the changes are small. However, if you prefer, I will see how well templates and change bars get along.

I made no changes to the styles themselves, since those wouldn't show change bars (would they?).

HTH, /tj/
AFAIK, the start and cont list styles are the same. Have we ever used them differently? When I was at Motorla/Freescale, the style guide had also used three, similar to our start, cont, and end.

And one other, why does OOo include a period in Cont.?

Gary

--

Gary Schnabl
2775 Honorah
Detroit MI 48209

Reply via email to