I think DefaultComponentSelector should be changed to
ExcaliburComponentSelector as well.
- Kasper
----- Original Message -----
From: "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:10 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Excalibur Component Manager naming
> Due to the response that the naming of the Excalibur's Component Manager
> is confusing, I propose to deprecate Excalibur's DefaultComponentManager
> and rename the class to ExcaliburComponentManager.
>
>
> More than one person has found that simply package name differentiation
> is not enough. The goal is to have a relatively easily comprehensible
> system. We should avoid unnecessary confusion (which this is) whenever
> possible.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
