> At 10:10 AM 5/30/01 -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> >Due to the response that the naming of the Excalibur's Component Manager
> >is confusing, I propose to deprecate Excalibur's DefaultComponentManager
> >and rename the class to ExcaliburComponentManager.
> >
> >
> >More than one person has found that simply package name differentiation
> >is not enough. The goal is to have a relatively easily comprehensible
> >system. We should avoid unnecessary confusion (which this is) whenever
> >possible.
>
> +1
>
> As long as we leave a deprecated
>
> class DefaultComponentManager extends ExcaliburComponentManager {}
>
> around for a while.
+1 to that. Same for the selector, of course =)
> how does vote system work in apache - should goto website or vote
> in mailing
> list?
Please read the docs on jakarta.apache.org. Voting is for committers...
though suggestions are always welcome from everyone.
cheers,
LSD
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
