At 10:10 AM 5/30/01 -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote:
>Due to the response that the naming of the Excalibur's Component Manager
>is confusing, I propose to deprecate Excalibur's DefaultComponentManager
>and rename the class to ExcaliburComponentManager.
>
>
>More than one person has found that simply package name differentiation
>is not enough. The goal is to have a relatively easily comprehensible
>system. We should avoid unnecessary confusion (which this is) whenever
>possible.
+1
As long as we leave a deprecated
class DefaultComponentManager extends ExcaliburComponentManager {}
around for a while.
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
