Stephen McConnell wrote:
It very much concerns me where there is considerable pressure on one hand to be non-devisive (i.e. no -1s) and on the otherhand, the suggestion that someone thinks that the PMC in general thinks its not our problem. Yes it is our problem - the only issue is when do we bite the bullet and bring Phoenix into Avalon. That will require effort and resource and will. I don't think those ingridients will be available until we get the container API in place. In the meantime we have two options:
Do you believe that -1 is the only path to consensus?
(b) the easy option
Let Phoenix development continue in an independent path.
(a) the hard option
Stop further divergence of Phoenix.
My interests in resurrecting this thread are not in stopping anything, but to start something that doesn't seem to be occuring:
communication
At a minimum, James is one "customer" of Phoenix. I will assert that the current state of affairs is not in the best interests of either James or Avalon.
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
