Leo Simons wrote:
Berin Loritsch wrote:Leo-- I believe that the Voting procedures we previously voted on required that all [VOTE]s had to start as a [PROPOSAL].yep.However, at this time I have to put forth a -1, because it is not something that was formally proposed before a call for vote.
it was!
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-dev&m=104159238925982&w=2
as there were no replies (Steve said he'd comment but didn't....) I went ahead and did as I said I would do.
Loe correct on this - I actually thought about the same point as a way of interception and derailing Leo's iniative. So I checked his email and guess what - he applied the policies - and bottom line is that that is what policies are for - Leo get get me to get off my but and address this by excaliating the issue within the scope of the establish policies and procedures (gee, Leo is scarry - he learning too fast).
Can we go through a formal Proposal before a call to vote on this?
We can go through it again if you want. I'm kinda fed up with all "procedure" already though. Time- and effort-consuming, this "formalism".
Don't get fed up - what we working oon is really importat stuff - it will outlive Avalon, Avlon 5 and UberContainer. You are one of the founding fathers and little children in a 2048 will look up a digital plaque comemorating the your words of wisdom attributed to someone called LS.
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
