On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:13:36AM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > >>+1 > >> > >>Carsten > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Jeff Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>> > >>> > >>>On this subject, I see that while some classes were moved from > >>>org.apache.avalon.excalibur to org.apache.excalibur, others weren't: > >>> > > > > > >I certainly have missed the discussion about this, but why has the > >"excalibur" package moved at the same level as "avalon" ? > > I missed it too.
It's in the archives somewhere. IIRC people were complaining about the excessive typing required. > Given that we are reorganizing into Framework-Contaier-Components, does > it still make sense to have an o.a.excalibur package? jeff@expresso:~/apache/jakarta/jakarta-avalon-excalibur$ find . -name "excalibur" | grep -v avalon | grep src | grep -v test ./assembly/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./cache/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./tar/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./altrmi/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./zip/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./event/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./baxter/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./bzip2/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./instrument/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./container/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./fortress/examples/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./fortress/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./fortress/src/ng/org/apache/excalibur ./thread/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./util/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./sourceresolve/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./threadcontext/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./configuration/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./converter/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./jprocess/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./instrument-client/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./meta/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./store/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./xmlutil/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./instrument-manager/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./loader/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./policy/src/java/org/apache/excalibur ./xfc/src/java/org/apache/excalibur Personally I don't care how 'non-optimal' the o.a.excalibur package name is deemed. I'd prefer to keep it rather than continue to jerk users around with package renaming. --Jeff -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
