> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > I certainly have missed the discussion about this, but why has the
> > "excalibur" package moved at the same level as "avalon" ?
>
> I missed it too.
It happened a long time ago. For things that were released, we couldn't
just change packages. That would be detrimental.
However, for new stuff, org.apache.${project-name} was decided because it
was smaller and easier to type.
> Given that we are reorganizing into
> Framework-Contaier-Components, does
> it still make sense to have an o.a.excalibur package?
>
> What should we name packages that we will be creating from now on?
For the time being, use org.apache.${project-name}
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
