Jeff Turner wrote:
NKB wrote:Given that we are reorganizing into Framework-Contaier-Components, does it still make sense to have an o.a.excalibur package?
[...]
Yes, I'm not talking about package renaming, I'm definately against it. In fact the Avalon Components proposal was about moving to a single repo but keeping all package names intact.
Personally I don't care how 'non-optimal' the o.a.excalibur package name
is deemed. I'd prefer to keep it rather than continue to jerk users
around with package renaming.
I was asking myself if we should use o.a.excalibur or o.a.a.excalibur in new packages.
Whatever, it's not important now.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
