On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Weddington, Eric wrote:
> I'm open to having the LGPL license on such a library project.
> (Definitely not the GPL, though.) I can be persuaded to either the BSD
> or LGPL license.
There's another (I'd argue, better) alternative: the CDDL. Certianly
worth evaluating...
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, SCSECA, OGB member
. * * . * .* .
. * . .*
President, * . . /\ ( . . *
Rite Online Inc. . . / .\ . * .
.*. / * \ . .
. /* o \ .
* '''||''' .
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich ******************
_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
