As Rich Teer wrote: > There's another (I'd argue, better) alternative: the CDDL. > Certianly worth evaluating...
Can you elaborate on "better"? My first impression for a couple of reasons why I don't really like it: . yet another license model (we've had quite a hard time in the past to move everything into one license statement) . artificially incompatible with GPL (I'm not really fond of the GPL but don't see a reason to emit code that is incompatible with it) . much more license text to worry about than the relatively simple BSD license -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
