As Weddington, Eric wrote:

> Thanks for the reminder; you're right it's GPL+exception. Then I
> would be OK with a library having such a license.

I find it quite complicated, compared to the plain old BSD-style
license we've been using for avr-libc for years now.  Is there any
specific reason you want it, are you unhappy that anyone could get
along with changing it but not feeding back his changes?

I think the feedback we've got on avr-libc itself was impressive
enough, and often was even above the level we could manage at all.
That's why I don't fear we would ever get too few feedback for a
library like this one, even if the license doesn't require it.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

Reply via email to