As Weddington, Eric wrote: > Thanks for the reminder; you're right it's GPL+exception. Then I > would be OK with a library having such a license.
I find it quite complicated, compared to the plain old BSD-style license we've been using for avr-libc for years now. Is there any specific reason you want it, are you unhappy that anyone could get along with changing it but not feeding back his changes? I think the feedback we've got on avr-libc itself was impressive enough, and often was even above the level we could manage at all. That's why I don't fear we would ever get too few feedback for a library like this one, even if the license doesn't require it. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
