I've decompiled the swf and it is only a video, great engine ;-)
2010/12/13 Brian Bosak <[email protected]> > It did look like just a video, not an actual demo.... > > -----Original Message----- From: Jensa Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 3:34 > PM To: Away3D.dev Subject: [away3d] Re: rocket ninja mentions Away3D in > comparison > The fact that they use Away3D for comparison is very cool. Being > compared to commercial / proprietary software isn't something that > happens to every Open Source project out there, so I would say that is > a testament to how good Away3D really is. > > According to their funding press release "..,10,000 building blocks > known as polygons ... [the] ... level of quality is close to what you > would find in a high-end console game". Won't $3.5 Million in funding > buy you something better than a Dreamcast? I like Ninjas, but these > seem like the american kind. You know the ones that look cool in > movies but can't fight for real ;-) > > That said - I'm sure they'll build a kick-ass engine once they get to > it, but such claims are pretty lame when all you have to show is some > 2D Facebook games (that both are copies of bestselling games from > competitors) and a video of a knight? Did I miss something or did they > have an actual running demo there? > > J > > On Dec 12, 6:38 pm, Craig Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Have you guys seen this? Rocket Ninja has a 3D engine and they are >> claiming how much better than Away3D it is. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> http://www.rocketninja.com/Home/About/Articles/Shr3D-.aspx >> >
