lol On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Jensa <[email protected]> wrote:
> The fact that they use Away3D for comparison is very cool. Being > compared to commercial / proprietary software isn't something that > happens to every Open Source project out there, so I would say that is > a testament to how good Away3D really is. > > According to their funding press release "..,10,000 building blocks > known as polygons ... [the] ... level of quality is close to what you > would find in a high-end console game". Won't $3.5 Million in funding > buy you something better than a Dreamcast? I like Ninjas, but these > seem like the american kind. You know the ones that look cool in > movies but can't fight for real ;-) > > That said - I'm sure they'll build a kick-ass engine once they get to > it, but such claims are pretty lame when all you have to show is some > 2D Facebook games (that both are copies of bestselling games from > competitors) and a video of a knight? Did I miss something or did they > have an actual running demo there? > > J > > On Dec 12, 6:38 pm, Craig Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > > Have you guys seen this? Rocket Ninja has a 3D engine and they are > > claiming how much better than Away3D it is. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > http://www.rocketninja.com/Home/About/Articles/Shr3D-.aspx > -- ___________________ Actionscript 3.0 Flash 3D Graphics Engine HTTP://AWAY3D.COM
